PDA

View Full Version : Should a riser be perfectly balanced out of the box?

Leighton
21-07-2004, 06:01 AM
why?
clever_guy
21-07-2004, 08:19 AM
So you can throw it farther and more accurately???...

8) :P :P

-CG
Focal
21-07-2004, 11:01 AM
ideally-----no. You would probably want it to be perfectly balanced with all accessories on, at full draw, as this is where you want it to be most stable and steady.
A&O
21-07-2004, 01:44 PM
as far as i know only WW makes risers that are like balanced without anything on..and it feels good.. 8)

shot other brands which are not and find it no bother to get the balance you like with stabs and weights..
grantwomack
21-07-2004, 05:21 PM
This is also the reason W&W have released a number of back weights for their bows. If you are going to put front stabilizers on the bow, you might as well have one that is slightly backward balanced to begin with. No matter how much weight you put on the back, it's doubtful you'd ever equal the weight on the front.
A&O
22-07-2004, 12:47 AM
well..if the end results going to be like weight out front to stabilise your aim..why would you want weight at the back?

just use less weights out front or shorter longs isn't it?
A&O
22-07-2004, 12:48 AM
well..if the end results going to be like weight out front to stabilise your aim..why would you want weight at the back?

just use less weights out front or shorter longs isn't it?
A&O
22-07-2004, 12:49 AM
well..if the end results going to be like weight out front to stabilise your aim..why would you want weight at the back?

just use less weights out front or shorter longs isn't it?